The adoption of a formal working definition of anti-Gypsyism (anti-Roma prejudice) by the Czech Parliament is undoubtedly a significant step in the effort to raise awareness and reduce anti-Roma sentiment in society. As Lucie Fukova stated, the definition, which considers anti-Gypsyism a form of racism against Roma, is not legally binding, but it can help in the effort to improve the situation. It was introduced in 2020 by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and calls on the Czech Republic to adopt and use it in practice as a member state.

The adoption of this definition would have symbolic significance and should help raise awareness of discrimination and prejudice, set targeted measures and promote equal opportunities. It includes discriminatory actions, expressions or attitudes towards Roma by individuals or institutions that lead to the exclusion and devaluation of Roma culture, physical violence, or expressions of hatred towards people considered to be “Roma”, combined with offensive stereotypes and distorted racist ideas.

Adopting a definition is one thing, but adhering to it in real life and in politics is essential. This includes making efforts to involve Roma in planning and decision-making, negotiating with politicians on measures in education, housing, employment, and also making progress on compensation for illegal sterilizations. These steps are necessary for real change in the attitudes and practices that support anti-Gypsyism.

All institutions and individuals need to focus not only on the formal adoption of the definition, but also on its actual implementation in all aspects of social life, from education to employment, housing and politics, to ensure that Roma in the Czech Republic can live free from discrimination and prejudice.